Level Up Your Vibe Coding: Refining the AI Workflow with Gemini Brainstormer and ChatGPT-o1 Deep Research

Posted April 11, 2025 by Priyadarshan Giri ‐ 5 min read

Gemini brainstorming gem + ChatGPT o1 Deep research = Match made in heaven for vibe coding

In my previous post, I shared my experience rapidly building a Recruiter Platform in just seven days using what I termed "vibe coding" – heavily relying on AI tools like ChatGPT-o1 for generating development prompts and Claude 3.7 Sonnet via GitHub Copilot for implementation. While that approach was successful for meeting a tight deadline, reflection often sparks refinement. I've since realized there's an even more robust way to kickstart these AI-driven development sprints, leading to potentially smoother execution and higher-quality outputs.

Recap: The Original "Vibe Coding" Flow

The initial workflow looked something like this:

  1. Craft Detailed Prompt: Write a comprehensive description of the project requirements.
  2. Generate Sub-Prompts: Feed this description to ChatGPT-o1 to break it down into a series of detailed, step-by-step development prompts.
  3. Implement with AI: Use the generated prompts with an AI coding assistant (like Claude/Copilot) to write the actual code.

This worked, but its success hinged heavily on the quality and completeness of that initial descriptive prompt. Any ambiguity or missing detail could cascade into less effective sub-prompts and require more correction during the coding phase.

The Epiphany: Refining the Starting Point is Key

The critical insight was that the very first step – defining the project idea itself – could be significantly enhanced with AI assistance before even thinking about generating development prompts. This led to exploring a more structured approach using specific AI capabilities tailored for different stages.

Step 1: Supercharging the Idea with Gemini 2.5 Pro Brainstormer

The new process begins not just with a raw idea, but by fleshing it out using Gemini 2.5 Pro equipped with its Brainstormer gem. This built-in capability is designed specifically to take a core concept and expand upon it, adding layers of crucial detail.

Instead of relying solely on my own ability to foresee every requirement, Brainstormer helps to:

  • Clarify Motive: Solidify the "why" behind the project.
  • Define Technical Requirements: Detail the specific functionalities needed.
  • Identify Tools & Technologies: Suggest or confirm the stack (databases, frameworks, libraries).
  • Consider Paradigms: Think about architectural patterns or development methodologies.
  • Assess Infrastructure: Consider deployment needs and available resources.
  • Gauge Complexity: Get a better sense of the overall effort and potential challenges.

The output is a comprehensive summary that goes far beyond a simple project description. It becomes a rich, detailed blueprint informed by AI's broad knowledge base.

Step 2: Generating Development Prompts with ChatGPT-o1 Deep Research

With this highly detailed summary in hand, the next step is generating the actual development prompts. For this crucial task, I've found ChatGPT-o1's Deep Research feature to be exceptionally well-suited, particularly compared to other tools like Gemini's own Deep Research for this specific purpose.

Here's why:

  1. In-Depth Research & Self-Correction: Like its name suggests, it dives deep into web resources to inform the prompt generation, potentially finding optimal ways to structure tasks or use libraries. It also performs self-correction cycles, refining the output before presenting it.
  2. Flexible Output Format: This is a major advantage. I can specifically request the series of development prompts be delivered within a code block. This makes them incredibly easy to copy, paste, and manage. Gemini's Deep Research, in contrast, typically outputs a narrative research document, which is less practical for direct use as development prompts.
  3. Contextual Clarification: If the comprehensive summary from Brainstormer still has gaps relevant to generating the prompts, o1 Deep Research will often proactively ask clarifying questions. This interactive element helps ensure the generated prompts are well-aligned with the project goals and constraints before generation, significantly reducing ambiguity.

Feeding the detailed, Brainstormer-enhanced summary into ChatGPT-o1 Deep Research, and specifically asking for a code block output of sequential development prompts, creates a powerful synergy.

The Refined "Vibe Coding" Workflow

The improved workflow now looks like this:

  1. Idea Expansion: Initial Project Idea -> Gemini 2.5 Pro + Brainstormer Gem -> Comprehensive Project Summary.
  2. Prompt Generation: Comprehensive Summary -> ChatGPT-o1 Deep Research (requesting code block output) -> High-Quality Series of Development Prompts.
  3. Implementation: Development Prompts -> Claude 3.7 Sonnet / GitHub Copilot -> Code Implementation, Testing & Iteration.

Why This Matters: Towards Near Foolproof Prompts

This refined approach significantly increases the likelihood of generating high-quality, actionable development prompts. By investing more effort (with AI assistance) in the initial planning and detailing phase using Gemini Brainstormer, we create superior input for ChatGPT-o1 Deep Research. Its research capabilities, combined with its ability to ask for clarification and provide output in the desired format, result in prompts that are more precise, context-aware, and less prone to misinterpretation by the implementation AI (like Claude/Copilot). This leads to a smoother coding phase with potentially fewer detours and errors – bringing us closer to a "near foolproof" prompt generation system for vibe coding.

Looking Ahead

This evolution in my approach highlights the dynamic nature of working with AI. As tools become more specialized (like Gemini's gems) and features more powerful (like o1 Deep Research's flexibility and depth), our workflows can adapt to leverage these strengths. I'm excited to apply this refined process to future rapid development challenges and see how it further streamlines the path from idea to execution.

Conclusion

While the original "vibe coding" method proved effective under pressure, refining the process by incorporating Gemini 2.5 Pro's Brainstormer for initial detailing and ChatGPT-o1 Deep Research for flexible, high-quality prompt generation marks a significant step forward. It emphasizes that the most effective AI-assisted development involves not just using AI for coding, but strategically leveraging different AI capabilities throughout the entire project lifecycle, starting with a deeply understood and well-defined plan.